mlewis327
Forum Replies Created
-
AuthorPosts
-
mlewis327ParticipantNikka, Great voice and tone. In the Dupixent ad, I felt your pronunciation of “Dupixent” was a bit harsh. A smoother pronunciation to make it more appealing would be my suggestion. Of course, the advertiser will be listening for that too. The second ad for Loreal seemed more natural. The tone and pace are good. In the phase, “the original brush separates every lash,” I would read “lash” more smoothly. I might also emphasize a bit more the phrase “American’s number one masacara.” Overall, I hear your voice and delivery as very good, but would be even better by smoothing out words that you emphasize.
mlewis327ParticipantVery well done. I like your voice in this type of read. Pacing and tone seems spot on to me.
mlewis327ParticipantDaniel, As Ms. Hayes said, you have a great voice and tone. She is right about the pace of delivery. You could slow it a bit in places to even out the pace. Don’t rush in the longer sentences, keep it balanced. Very good sound.
mlewis327ParticipantWhile I don’t like to focus too much on audio quality in listening to others (that can be worked out later), I find the echo/reflections in your audio a bit distracting from your read. Delivery is good.
mlewis327ParticipantVery clear delivery and upbeat. I agree with the other reviewer that you might improve it with a little faster pace, perhaps connecting your sentences like in conversational speech.
mlewis327ParticipantVery natural pace and tone. Can’t find much to nit pick. I might put a bit more emphasis on “body” at the close.
mlewis327ParticipantI think your tone and pacing are good. I don’t focus on editing or audio effects so much as listening to delivery. You sound very close to natural.
-
AuthorPosts
